Diagnostic Histopathology
Volume 15, Issue 1 , Pages 42-50, January 2009

Prognostic markers in low-grade papillary urothelial neoplasms of the urinary bladder: an update

David Ramos MD is Professor at the Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain

Abstract 

Papillary urothelial neoplasms of the urinary bladder comprise a heterogeneous spectrum of ‘continuous’ lesions in which the assessment of an accurate histological grade and tumour stage is mandatory for the clinical management of patients. The 1998 World Health Organization/International Society of Urologic Pathologists (WHO/ISUP) consensus classification and the 1999 WHO classification proposed new malignancy grading schemes, mainly based on morphometric studies for the replacement of the 1973 WHO grading system. In accordance with these novel grading systems, two major categories of papillary urothelial neoplasms were distinguished: low-grade and high-grade papillary urothelial neoplasms. Concerning the specific subgroup of low-grade tumours, two other entities were defined: papillary urothelial neoplasms of low malignant potential (PUNLMP) and low-grade papillary urothelial carcinomas (LGPUC). In long-term follow-up programmes, PUNLMP have demonstrated low recurrence rates and minimal risk for tumour progression in comparison with LGPUC. However, grade assessment is a subjective decision and, on occasion, the use of reproducible criteria by urological pathologists is difficult due to tumour heterogeneity and to the existence of a variable number of cases situated between consecutive groups. As a result, to determine a better correlation with clinicopathological patient outcome, other predictive markers are being investigated. Among these, the prognostic significance of classical clinicopathological, morphometric, cytometric, immunohistochemical and molecular markers have been widely reported. This review summarizes the prognostic importance of all these markers in the prediction of tumour recurrences and progression in low-grade papillary urothelial bladder neoplasms.

Keywords: bladder, neoplasms, prognostic markers, pathology

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1756-2317(08)00206-5

doi:10.1016/j.mpdhp.2008.11.002

Diagnostic Histopathology
Volume 15, Issue 1 , Pages 42-50, January 2009