Diagnostic Histopathology
Volume 15, Issue 2 , Pages 99-103 , February 2009

Virtual slides: an introduction

References 

  1. Klatt EC. Webpath: the Internet Pathology Laboratory for Medical Education. http://library.med.utah.edu/WebPath/webpath.html (accessed 1.07.08).
  2. Krippendorf BB, Lough J. Complete and rapid switch from light microscopy to virtual microscopy for teaching medical histology. Anat Rec B New Anat. 2005;285:19–25
  3. Kumar RK, Freeman B, Velan GM, De Permentier PJ. Integrating histology and histopathology teaching in practical classes using virtual slides. Anat Rec B New Anat. 2006;289:128–133
  4. Furness P. A randomized controlled trial of the diagnostic accuracy of internet-based telepathology compared with conventional microscopy. Histopathology. 2007;50:266–273
  5. PRISMATIC Project Management Team . Assessment of automated primary screening on PAPNET of cervical smears in the PRISMATIC trial. Lancet. 1999;353:1381–1385
  6. Baak JP, ten Cate FJ, Offerhaus GJ, van Lanschott JJ, Meijer GA. Routine morphometrical analysis can improve reproducibility of dysplasia grade in Barrett’s oesophagus surveillance biopsies. J Clin Pathol. 2002;55:910–916
  7. Kinkingnehun S, Sarazin M, Lehericy S, Guichart-Gomez E, Hergueta T, Dubois B. VBM anticipates the rate of progression of Alzheimer disease: a 3-year longitudinal study. Neurology. 2008;70:2201–2211
  8. Cross SS, Dennis T, Start RD. Telepathology: current status and future prospects in diagnostic histopathology. Histopathology. 2002;41:91–109
  9. Treanor D, Quirke P. The virtual slide and conventional microscope – a direct comparison of their diagnostic efficiency. In: Annual Meeting of the Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland, Glasgow, 2007.

PII: S1756-2317(09)00007-3

doi: 10.1016/j.mpdhp.2009.01.006

Diagnostic Histopathology
Volume 15, Issue 2 , Pages 99-103 , February 2009