Diagnostic Histopathology
Volume 15, Issue 4 , Pages 213-219 , April 2009

How to count and measure features on slides

References 

  1. Deverell MH, Salisbury JR, Whimster WF. Comparison of stains for image segmentation and measurement of nuclear parameters by computerised image analysis using IBAS 2000. Pathol Res Pract. 1989;185:555–557
  2. Deverell MH, Best E, Salisbury JR. Lymphoid infiltrates in B cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: comparing nuclear characteristics between lymph node and bone marrow; and evaluating diagnostic features of bone marrow infiltrates in paraffin-embedded tissues. Anal Cell Pathol. 1997;14:1–7
  3. Greenhough RB. Varying degrees of malignancy in cancer of the breast. J Cancer Res. 1925;9:452–463
  4. Bullough WS. Mitotic activity in the tissue of dead mice, and in tissues kept in physiological salt solution. Exp Cell Res. 1950;1:410–420
  5. Norris HJ. Mitosis counting. Hum Pathol. 1976;7:483–484
  6. O’Connor DM, Norris HJ. Mitotically active leiomyomas of the uterus. Hum Pathol. 1990;21:223–227
  7. Weiss LM. Comparative histologic study of 43 metastasizing and nonmetastasizing adrenocortical tumors. Am J Surg Pathol. 1984;8:163–169
  8. Elston CW, Ellis IO. Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grades in breast cancer. Experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology. 1991;19:403–410
  9. Van der Esch EP, Cascinelli N, Preda F, Morabita A, Bufalino R. Stage I melanoma of the skin. Evaluation of prognosis according to histologic characteristics. Cancer. 1981;48:1668–1673
  10. Azzola MF, Shaw HM, Thompson JF, et al. Tumour mitotic rate is a more powerful prognostic indicator than ulceration in patients with primary cutaneous melanoma: an analysis of 3661 patients from a single center. Cancer. 2003;97:1488–1498
  11. Minimum dataset for the histopathological reporting of common skin cancers. London: Royal College of Pathologists; 2002;
  12. Biesterfield S, Noll I, Noll E, Wohltmann D, Blocking A. Mitotic frequency as a prognostic factor in breast cancer. Hum Pathol. 1995;26:47–52
  13. De Jong JS, Van Diest PJ, Baak JPA. Hot spot microvessel density and the mitotic activity index are strong additional prognostic indicators in invasive breast cancer. Histopathology. 2000;36:301–312
  14. Barnes L, Johnson JT. Pathologic and clinical considerations in the evaluation of major head and neck specimens resected for cancer. Part 1. Pathol Annu. 1986;21:173–250
  15. Fletcher CDM, Bermann JJ, Corless C, et al. Diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a consensus approach. Hum Pathol. 2000;33:459–465
  16. Haratake J, Takeda S, Kasai T, Nakano S, Tokui N. Predictable factors for estimating prognosis of patients after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer. 1993;72:1178–1183
  17. Lauwers GY, Terris B, Balis UJ, et al. Prognostic histologic indicators of curatively resected hepatocellular carcinomas: a multi-institutional analysis of 425 patients with definition of a histologic prognostic index. Am J Surg Pathol. 2002;26:25–34
  18. Lipponen PK, Eskelinen MJ, Jauhiainen K, Harju E, Terho R, Haapasalo H. Grading of superficial bladder cancer by quantitative mitotic frequency analysis. J Urol. 1993;149:36–41
  19. Tornos C, Silva EG, El-Naggar A, Burke TW. Aggressive stage I grade I endometrial carcinoma. Cancer. 1992;70:790–798
  20. Joshi VV, Cantor AB, Altshuler G, et al. Recommendations for modification of terminology of neuroblastic tumors and prognostic significance of Shimada classification. A clinicopathologic study of 213 cases from the Pediatric Oncology Group. Cancer. 1992;69:2183–2196
  21. Joshi VV, Cantor AB, Altshuler G, et al. Age-linked prognostic categorization based on a new histologic grading system of neuroblastomas. A clinicopathologic study of 211 cases from the Pediatric Oncology Group. Cancer. 1992;69:2197–2212
  22. Franc B, Rosenberg-Bourgin M, Caillou B, et al. Medullary thyroid carcinoma: search for histological predictors of survival (109 proband cases analysis). Hum Pathol. 1998;29:1078–1084
  23. Solcia E, Kloppel G, Sobin LH. World Health Organization histological typing of endocrine tumors. Berlin: Springer; 2000;
  24. Johnsen SG. Testicular biopsy score count – A method for registration of spermatogenesis in human testes: normal values and results in 335 hypogonadal males. Hormones. 1970;1:2–25
  25. Brown DC, Gatter KC. Monoclonal antibody Ki67: its use in histopathology. Histopathology. 1990;17:489–503
  26. Kleihues P, Cavanee WK. World Health Organization classification of tumours. Pathology and genetics – tumours of the nervous system. Lyon: IARC Press; 2000;
  27. Allred DC, Harvey JM, Berardo M, Clark GM. Prognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer by immunohistochemical analysis. Mod Pathol. 1998;11:155–168
  28. Breslow A. Thickness, cross-sectional areas and depth of invasion in the prognosis of malignant melanoma. Ann Surg. 1970;182:572–575
  29. Breslow A. Problems in the measurement of tumour thickness and level of invasion in cutaneous melanoma. Hum Pathol. 1997;8:1–2
  30. Sobin LH, Wittekind C. In: TNM classification of malignant tumours. 6th edn.. New York: Wiley-Liss; 2002;
  31. Underwood EE. Quantitative stereology. Reading. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company; 1970;
  32. Weibel ER. Stereological methods. vol. 1. Practical methods for biological morphometry. London: Academic Press; 1979;
  33. Dubowitz V, Sewry CA. Muscle biopsy. A practical approach. 3rd edn.. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2007;
  34. Hopster DJ, Codd JD, Rose PE, Salisbury JR. The use of different histomorphometric parameters in the routine assessment of human skeletal muscle biopsies. Anal Cell Pathol. 1996;12:173–185
  35. Byers PD, Smith R. Trephine for full-thickness iliac-crest biopsy. Br Med J. 1967;i:682–683
  36. Harris WH. A microscopic method of determining rates of bone growth. Nature. 1960;188:1038–1039
  37. Von Kossa J. Ueber die im organismus kiinstlich erzeugbaren verkalkungen. Beitr patholog Anat allge Pathol. 1901;29:163
  38. Van Gieson J. Laboratory notes of technical methods for the nervous system. New York Med J. 1889;50:57–60

PII: S1756-2317(09)00032-2

doi: 10.1016/j.mpdhp.2009.02.003

Diagnostic Histopathology
Volume 15, Issue 4 , Pages 213-219 , April 2009

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution